Though quantum physics has predictive power, it may be that in the sea of qualifications and relativity it creates the predictions it espouses. These philosophical qualifications are the foundation with no underlying described reality that they deviate from, which is problematic as it is not coherent. To say then that lack of coherence or a lack of a foundation is the essence of the theory is in fact the laziness that early physicists, Einstein and Bohr included, tried to avoid with numerous and countless debates and meetings. A theory cannot have its foundation on numerous qualifications. For it must have a substance from which to deviate. However, the theory of relativity and quantum physics is precisely this. A house of qualifications, with no substance. It is a failure of philosophy within physics and a failure of physicists to create a theory with explanatory power, not a mess of qualifications either no reference point.
Quantum physics experiments are highly manipulable based on reference points. Though the math may be sound and stable within the system and conditions preset, it is very much entrenched in that system to the point that it is bound to create predictions it concludes are later true.
To clarify for the more astute, quantum physics experiments are deeply dependent on the reference frames and measurement conditions under which they are conducted. While the mathematical formalism is internally consistent and highly predictive, its empirical confirmations occur within a framework the theory itself helps define. This raises the concern that the theory’s success may reflect not only its correspondence to reality, but also the structure of the conditions through which that reality is accessed.