N. T. Wright is a gravely mistaken theologian, believing that justification is about the laws and rules of circumcision and other dietary restrictions for being considered of the people of God, as in Jewish. This makes justification only pertain to laws that have no moral input but of societal and covenant keeping significance. This is a sign of some kind of mental obsession, as the blood of God was not spilt upon the ground so that one can remain uncircumcised and eat pork.
Some may argue that he means no harm, for he proclaims the new heavens and new earth with renewed emphasis; however, his misinterpretation of the Book of Romans and the Law of Moses referenced in this book is too great of a mistake. For the law cannot be said to be that which makes mankind conscious of sin and demonstrate that all fall short of the glory of God if it merely is a matter of circumcision and dietary laws and other formalities that identify a Jew as a Jew and of the people of God.
Even Aquinas, who rests his claim on the writings of saints who preceded him, and the oldest Catechisms of the Catholic Church teach that justification is in fact the remission of sins. It is not a Protestant lens or modern interpretation.